06 Mar 2013 08:03:44
If, at the season, qpr got relegated, Newcastle were interested in taking remy again. And we were the only club who was interested in him, if remy came out and said, Look, I chose qpr for money, I was wrong to.
If he did that and he was available as he would not want to play in the championship, would you want him? I think I would as long as he admitted he was wrong to choose qpr for money.
Reply or agree means yes you would take him and disagree means no you wouldn't take him.
Id certainly prefer remy to AC

What is wrong with Remy choosing money, especially when the offer from QPR was a lot lot more.

Think about it like this, Remy would practically be paying 20,000 a week out of his own pocket to play for Newcastle if he chose us over QPR.

20,000 is an estimate of how bigger the QPR offer was. (Probably more)

It was clear that we were the club he wanted to join, but I do not blame him for taking the bigger offer, obviously QPR wanted him more than we did.

It is not like Remy is English and owes anyone a reason to take less wages.

Just to add, Remy cannot play for 3 clubs in 1 year.

The thing wrong with remy choosing money is because:
1. QPR Just throw money at players because that's all they can do to attract players like remy to a small london club with 18,000 seater stadium.
2. No, you cannot play for 3 clubs in a season, not in a year.
3. Remy has almost ruined his career in the premier league as if qpr go down, hardly any PL teams will want him, so he'll end up going to germany or spain.

Here we go, the we are BIG thing again. Wise up for heavens sake, that argument does not mean we are best.

The only question you should ask your self about Remy is

"he only went to QPR for more money, would we even want him at Newcastle if he only came to us for money?"